Britain is mad Giuliani thinks the NHS sucks
Oh wait, I see. So, every British media outlet under the (S)un can point out the NHS is awful... but the minute someone from overseas does it to counter Michael Moore's idiocy, it's off limits?
Damned Limeys.
n the radio ad, Giuliani, who has suffered prostate cancer, said the U.S. survival rate for the disease was 82 percent, but the survival rate in Britain was just 44 percent "under socialised medicine."
Britain's Health Secretary Alan Johnson said Giuliani's figures were wrong and the survival rate under Britain's National Health Service was in fact much higher.
"The British NHS should not become a political football in American presidential politics," Johnson told The Times newspaper.
"Our rate of prostate cancer survival is actually much higher than has been claimed. The latest data show a survival rate of over 70 percent and rising."
From Cancerpage.com
Bad news there Johnson, it already has. You can thank Sicko for that.
(According to The Telegraph figures for England say they're actually 52.7% for all cancers in women and 44.8% in men. Didn't see any comment from Alan Johnson in that article!)
Edit: Where the hell are Forbes getting this from?! Today, rates are higher - 99 percent in the U.S. and an estimated 74 percent in the U.K.
And if he did...
The former New York mayor got his numbers from an article in the City Journal, a quarterly magazine published by the conservative Manhattan Institute think tank.
Then why is the Telegraph using the same data?
Bad AP.
Labels: gaylord fockers, news, NHS, politics, stupid

